Spreets penalised

SpreetsThe Federal Court has ordered online deals site Spreets to pay penalties of $600,000 for making false or misleading representations to consumers about deals in contravention of the Australian Consumer Law (ACL).

The Court declared that between June 2011 and April 2012 when operating one of Australia’s largest online group buying websites, Spreets contravened the ACL by engaging in misleading and deceptive conduct and making false or misleading representations about the price of certain deals, consumers’ ability to redeem vouchers, and consumers’ refund rights.

Sarah Court, ACCC commissioner, said online consumer issues remain an enforcement priority for the ACCC.

“Online consumer issues remain an enforcement priority for the ACCC. The Court’s decision is a further reminder for online traders that the Australian Consumer Law applies to them, including consumer guarantees” Court said.

“All online businesses, including those offering daily deals, must ensure that representations made on their websites are clear and accurate, particularly in relation to price and any restrictions on a deal being offered, including availability, and redemption conditions.”

Spreets agreed to joint submissions on penalties and a statement of agreed facts to be filed with the Court, and consented to the other orders made by the Court.

Following the ACCC’s investigation, Spreets also took steps to update and improve its compliance program.

It is noted that Spreets no longer offers deals directly to consumers. It now gathers and publishes deals offered by a range of third party online group buying sites.

Background

The ACCC has received a significant number of complaints since the online group buying industry emerged in Australia in 2010 and has worked with other ACL regulators to improve practices in the industry.

These websites, also referred to as ‘daily deals’ or ‘deal of the day’ sites, sell vouchers for discounted goods or services. Online group buying sites typically negotiate these deals with businesses and then market the deals to their members and the public by promotional emails, social media promotions, and on their websites.

In December 2013, the Federal Court ordered Scoopon to pay total pecuniary penalties of $1 million for making false or misleading representations to both businesses and consumers.

In December 2014, the ACCC accepted a court enforceable undertaking from LivingSocial as a result of the ACCC’s concerns about a term in LivingSocial’s consumer contracts, and representations made on LivingSocial’s website.

Comments

Comment Manually

I have read and agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Inside Retail Polls

Do you plan to participate in Halloween this year?
Vote

Twitter

Do you enjoy receiving our daily Newsbriefs, weekly publications, quarterly magazines and attending our Academy eve… https://t.co/JdcO4xcwOH

3 weeks ago

Know an outstanding retailer supplier? Nominate them for the 2020 Retailer Awards: https://t.co/HsvxfGp6aK #RA20https://t.co/FsSnykknRF

1 month ago

Do you know any retailer with exceptional customer experience? Nominate them at 2020 Retailer Awards:… https://t.co/Tc3DDjJbFV

1 month ago
x

SUBSCRIBE
FREE NEWS BRIEFS Get breaking news delivered